Skip to main content

 

Danger of Ideological Rigidity in America 

In American governance, ideology often obstructs the fulfillment of this country’s mission.  America's mission, as outlined in its founding documents, emphasizes freedom, equality, and the pursuit of happiness. 

The Articles of Confederation, America's first governing document, illustrate the pitfalls of a strict ideological approach. Created during the Revolutionary War, the Articles established a notably weak central government that lacked essential powers, such as taxation and regulation of commerce. The national government had no authority over the states, each state had one vote, and any amendment to the Articles required unanimity. This rigidity left the fledgling nation unable to address foreign and domestic issues effectively, leading to extreme tensions among the colonies.

The inadequacies of the Articles became evident as economic turmoil and interstate conflicts arose during the 1780s. Congress struggled to resolve disputes and unrest, such as Shays' Rebellion, which underscored the need for a more effective governance framework. These challenges demonstrated that a strict ideological approach, without room for flexibility, hindered the nation's ability to grow and prosper.

Today, America faces ideological polarization reminiscent of the divisions seen during the Civil War. As President John Adams once remarked, “Ideology is the science of idiots.” Both Liberals and Conservatives who adhere rigidly to their ideologies believe they are acting in America's best interest, but they often obstruct progress. Pragmatism, not ideology, is essential to sustain the American experiment and move the nation forward.

For instance, Liberals who maintain that war is never necessary put the country at risk.  President John Adams also stated, “I must study politics and war [so] that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy.” This perspective underscores the necessity of preparedness to defend against threats, both foreign and domestic. Absolute pacifism can leave a nation vulnerable to aggression and undermine its security.

Conversely, Conservatives who believe war is always necessary also endanger the nation. General Norman Schwarzkopf's quote, “The more you sweat in peace, the less you bleed in war,” emphasizes the importance of diplomacy and preparation during peacetime to minimize conflict and bloodshed. A relentless focus on military solutions can drain resources and escalate tensions unnecessarily.

In governing, every issue, policy, and law must be debated before implementation. Some policies demand clear, decisive action with no room for compromise, while others benefit from seeking a middle ground. Politicians who boast about receiving an "A-plus" rating from any political group may lack independent thought and the unwillingness to make policies work for all citizens. Instead of blindly following ideology, leaders must engage in pragmatic problem-solving that considers diverse perspectives and seeks the best outcomes for society.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

 Communication The other day, I was listening to a podcast from the Lincoln Project. Rick Wilson was interviewing Adam Frisch, the candidate for Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, and they were discussing the importance of speaking to voters with dignity. This got me thinking—what does it truly mean to communicate with dignity? More importantly, how does one ensure that the person receiving that respect understands they are being treated with dignity? Webster defines dignity as “formal reserve or seriousness of manner, appearance, or language,” while respect is defined as “a relation or reference to a particular thing or situation.” Mr. Frisch pointed out that voters don’t like being talked down to, and he’s absolutely right. However, if simply pointing out misinformation or correcting a false belief is perceived as condescending, then our country is in deeper trouble than we realize. Consider this: how does one respectfully engage with someone who insists that Democrats cann...
  Faith and Judgment There is a time for everything under the heavens. Life ebbs and flows in seasons, each with its own purpose and meaning. As Ecclesiastes so poetically reminds Christians, there is “a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot.” These words reflect the rhythm of existence—joy and sorrow, building and tearing down, peace and conflict—all woven into the fabric of our humanity. While these seasons may seem random or even burdensome at times, the Scripture assures us that God has made everything beautiful in its time. Yet, as finite beings, we cannot fully fathom the vastness of God's plan, for He has set eternity in Christian hearts while veiling the full scope of His work. This truth sustains me. It reminds me that life on Earth, with all its toils and trials, has meaning far beyond what Christians can perceive. Christians are called to embrace the gifts of God: to find joy in our labor, to eat, drink, and live in satisfaction, for the...
  DEMOCRATIC PARTY part 2 Earlier, I wrote a blog discussing the future of the Democratic Party, with a focus on reshaping its nominating process. In that piece, I emphasized the need for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to reduce the number of delegates at the nominating convention and raise the percentage of delegates required to secure the presidential nomination. While I still believe these changes are necessary, I now think they shouldn’t be the first priority. After further consideration, I believe the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) top priority should be reorganizing its leadership structure. Currently, the DNC's officers include a Chairperson, five Vice Chairpersons, a Treasurer, a Secretary, and a National Finance Chairperson. To strengthen the party, no Chairperson position should be held by someone currently in elected office. Additionally, instead of having five Vice Chairpersons, the DNC should adopt a regional structure, with Regional Chairpersons re...