Skip to main content

 Problem with Ideology.  In a recent clip from Real Time with Bill Maher, the discussion between Stephanie Ruhle and Bret Stephens regarding Vice President Kamala Harris highlighted an alarming trend of blind partisanship. As a New York Times columnist, Stephens critiqued Harris for lacking substantive policy details, yet he seems to overlook a fundamental truth: it is Congress, not the President, that ultimately shapes legislation.

Stephens’ insistence on granular policy specifics misses the point of executive leadership, especially in foreign affairs. A Vice President must maintain a level of flexibility to adapt to rapidly changing global dynamics. This flexibility is not a sign of weakness or ambiguity; rather, it is essential for navigating the complexities of international relations in a way that best serves American interests.

Moreover, the tone exhibited in Stephens’ critique raises questions about the depth of partisan bias in contemporary discourse. It reflects a broader issue where individuals are quick to dismiss or deride opposing figures without engaging meaningfully with their policies or contexts. This brand of politics undermines constructive dialogue and hinders the potential for bipartisan solutions to the pressing challenges we face.

Ultimately, the conversation revealed not just personal grievances but a pervasive culture of animosity that can obstruct progress. The blind loyalty to party/ideology causes pragmatism to be thrown out with the bath water.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

 Communication The other day, I was listening to a podcast from the Lincoln Project. Rick Wilson was interviewing Adam Frisch, the candidate for Colorado’s 3rd Congressional District, and they were discussing the importance of speaking to voters with dignity. This got me thinking—what does it truly mean to communicate with dignity? More importantly, how does one ensure that the person receiving that respect understands they are being treated with dignity? Webster defines dignity as “formal reserve or seriousness of manner, appearance, or language,” while respect is defined as “a relation or reference to a particular thing or situation.” Mr. Frisch pointed out that voters don’t like being talked down to, and he’s absolutely right. However, if simply pointing out misinformation or correcting a false belief is perceived as condescending, then our country is in deeper trouble than we realize. Consider this: how does one respectfully engage with someone who insists that Democrats cann...
Post a Comment
Read more
  Faith and Judgment There is a time for everything under the heavens. Life ebbs and flows in seasons, each with its own purpose and meaning. As Ecclesiastes so poetically reminds Christians, there is “a time to be born and a time to die, a time to plant and a time to uproot.” These words reflect the rhythm of existence—joy and sorrow, building and tearing down, peace and conflict—all woven into the fabric of our humanity. While these seasons may seem random or even burdensome at times, the Scripture assures us that God has made everything beautiful in its time. Yet, as finite beings, we cannot fully fathom the vastness of God's plan, for He has set eternity in Christian hearts while veiling the full scope of His work. This truth sustains me. It reminds me that life on Earth, with all its toils and trials, has meaning far beyond what Christians can perceive. Christians are called to embrace the gifts of God: to find joy in our labor, to eat, drink, and live in satisfaction, for the...
Post a Comment
Read more
  DEMOCRATIC PARTY part 2 Earlier, I wrote a blog discussing the future of the Democratic Party, with a focus on reshaping its nominating process. In that piece, I emphasized the need for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) to reduce the number of delegates at the nominating convention and raise the percentage of delegates required to secure the presidential nomination. While I still believe these changes are necessary, I now think they shouldn’t be the first priority. After further consideration, I believe the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) top priority should be reorganizing its leadership structure. Currently, the DNC's officers include a Chairperson, five Vice Chairpersons, a Treasurer, a Secretary, and a National Finance Chairperson. To strengthen the party, no Chairperson position should be held by someone currently in elected office. Additionally, instead of having five Vice Chairpersons, the DNC should adopt a regional structure, with Regional Chairpersons re...
Post a Comment
Read more